You are here:

National Ad Challenging Adoption Discrimination Laws Rejected by Fox News as “Too Powerful”

Released on: September 20, 2017

Authors

Movement Advancement Project

Recommended Citation

Movement Advancement Project September 20, 2017 “National Ad Challenging Adoption Discrimination Laws Rejected by Fox News as “Too Powerful”“ https://mapresearch.org/press-release/national-ad-challenging-adoption-discrimination-laws-rejected-by-fox-news-as-too-powerful/ Accessed: June 12, 2026

Ad Coincides with ACLU’s Landmark Lawsuit Challenging Adoption Discrimination in Michigan

Washington, D.C., September 20, 2017 — As the American Civil Liberties Union announced the filing of a landmark lawsuit challenging LGBT adoption discrimination practices in Michigan, the Movement Advancement Project (MAP) unveiled a national ad and policy report underscoring the potential dangers that adoption-related religious exemption laws pose to children. The “Kids Pay the Price” ad, released in partnership with the Child Welfare League of America (CWLA) and the National Association of Social Workers (NASW), was targeted to debut on Fox News Channel’s Tucker Carlson Tonight, but was rejected by the network. MAP has released the 30-second spot online; the ad can be viewed at www.KidsPayThePrice.Org

“Politicians are passing these laws, so it’s important for the public to understand how these laws can hurt kids,” said Ineke Mushovic, Executive Director of the Movement Advancement Project. “Fox News Channel’s refusal to air the ad suggests that the consequences kids may experience as a result of these laws are so negative that it’s better to let these laws pass unchecked than to ask news audiences to grapple with how harmful and troubling these laws really are. Sweeping these issues under the rug simply means more kids in harm’s way.”

TV Ad: “Kids Pay the Price”Laws and practices similar to the those being challenged by the ACLU in Michigan exist in six other states and are being considered nationally. This year alone, South Dakota, Alabama and Texas passed legislation permitting state-licensed child welfare agencies to refuse to place and provide services to children and families, if doing so conflicts with their religious beliefs, joining Alabama, North Dakota, Virginia and Michigan for a total of seven states with such laws. Congress is also considering H.R. 1881, a federal bill that would cut federal funding for child welfare services by 15% to any state that passes or enforces nondiscrimination requirements for child services organizations.

MAP’s 30-second ad vividly depicts the kinds of harms children can face when agencies and workers are allowed to prioritize their individual beliefs over the best interest of children. In the ad, a social worker is depicted saying she would rather keep a child in foster care than allow her to be adopted by a qualified gay or lesbian couple; a child placement worker says that a gay or transgender child should be placed with families that support harmful ‘conversion therapy’ practices, and a placement worker says he shouldn’t have to place children in homes that don’t share his belief in “spare the rod, spoil the child.”

The ad concludes with Christine James-Brown, CEO and President of CWLA, speaking out against these harmful laws. CWLA’s mission is to advance policies, best practices and strategies that result in better outcomes for children and families. “We have laws governing child services agencies for a reason,” James-Brown says in the ad. “When states allow adoption decisions to be based on a worker’s individual beliefs, rather than the best interests of children, it’s children who pay the price.”

New Report on State Laws; ACLU LawsuitTo provide in-depth policy analysis of why religious exemptions like the law the ACLU is challenging in Michigan are so dangerous and ripe for abuse, MAP also published Kids Pay the Price: How Religious Exemptions for Child Welfare Agencies Harm Children, a new report developed in partnership with CWLA and NASW. The report offers a fact-based analysis of religious exemption laws, adoption discrimination, and the harms children across the country may suffer because of these laws.

The report notes that there are nearly 428,000 children in foster care in the United States, over 111,000 of whom are awaiting adoption. Of those children, 53% had been waiting more than two years for a permanent home. Yet adoption discrimination laws protect workers and agencies who reject LGBT and other qualified parents simply because those parents fail to meet the religious criteria imposed by the agency, forcing children to pay the price of discrimination.

The ACLU’s Michigan lawsuit documents how agencies are using the state’s religious exemption law to discriminate. The case was brought on behalf of two same-sex couples that were rejected as prospective adoptive parents by agencies simply because they were gay or lesbian. Another plaintiff is a former foster youth who experienced the challenges of finding a permanent home and objects to taxpayer dollars funding child-placing agencies that harm children by turning away loving and qualified families simply because of the agencies’ religious objections to those families.

“Child services workers are tasked with acting in the best interests of children,” said Heidi McIntosh, Deputy Director of Programs with NASW. “When states give agencies and workers a license to discriminate and to refuse to place children with qualified parents simply because those parents are gay or lesbian, or because they don’t share the agency’s beliefs, they’re creating a climate where fewer kids can find loving homes, and more kids are kept in government care.”

In fact, more than two-thirds (68%) of Americans oppose allowing taxpayer-funded child services agencies to refuse to place children with gay or lesbian couples, according to a pollreleased last week by PRRI.

For more information on the ad, or to speak with a representative of MAP, please contact Calla Rongerude at calla@lgbtmap.org. To speak with the ACLU about their lawsuit, contact Ryan Karerat at rkarerat@aclu.org.

# # #

MAP’s mission is to provide independent and rigorous research, insight and communications that help speed equality and opportunity for all. MAP works to ensure that all people have a fair chance to pursue health and happiness, earn a living, take care of the ones they love, be safe in their communities, and participate in civic life.
Last modified: March 25, 2026

Related resources

History of MAP: Tracking Equality and Democracy Through State Policy
In this second installment of our “History of MAP” series, we highlight MAP’s extensive collection of policy research — from its origins in the early 2000s to its most recent expansion through the Democracy Program.
Support for Transgender People is Higher Than Headlines Suggest
This partner brief from MAP and Advocates for Trans Equality (A4TE) offers new analysis which shows that transgender people are widely accepted and supported by their families, workplaces, faith communities, and more.
Democracy Maps Updates: June 2026
History of MAP: Analyzing the Movement’s Capacity
Equality Maps Updates hero
LGBTQ Equality Maps Updates: May 2026
In this rapidly changing landscape, MAP’s LGBTQ Equality Maps provide a detailed snapshot of the current state of LGBTQ laws and policies in the United States. See below for a listing of state level policy changes and MAP’s bill tracking updates as of May 26, 2026.
Mapping Democracy
This collection of voting and election-related resources includes periodic updates of state level policy changes, comprehensive retrospectives, legislative wrap-ups and forecasts.
Mapping Equality
This collection of LGBTQ-related resources includes periodic updates of state level policy changes and bill tracking, comprehensive retrospectives, legislative wrap-ups and forecasts.
The Supreme Court’s Decision to Gut the VRA Means State-Level Protections are More Important Than Ever
This analysis details the impact of the Callais decision and how states have responded to SCOTUS weakening the federal Voting Rights Act.
Talking About ID Update Bans hero image
Talking About ID Update Bans
Identification documents are vital keys that open doors to so many parts of everyday life. Learn about conversations that can help conflicted audiences understand what’s at stake when states seek to ban transgender people from updating the gender marker on their ID.

Join Our Community

Get research updates, stories, and ways to support.