You are here:

Issue Brief: The Need for an Executive Order

April 2013 - U.S. taxpayers send almost $300 billion per year in federal contract dollars to businesses in states that have not yet passed laws to protect LGBT workers from discrimination. An executive order would protect an additional 16 million workers and cover more than 20% of the U.S. workforce.

Authors

Movement Advancement Project
Center for American Progress
Freedom to Work
Human Rights Campaign
Out & Equal Workplace Advocates

Report Resources

Issue Brief: The Need for an Executive Order
Download

Recommended Citation

Movement Advancement Project. April 2013. Issue Brief: The Need for an Executive Order. https://mapresearch.org/report/issue-brief-the-need-for-an-executive-order/.

American taxpayers send almost $300 billion per year in federal contract dollars to businesses in states that have not yet passed laws to protect lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) workers from employment discrimination. In fact, a substantial majority (60%) of the 25 states in which businesses received $5 billion or more in federal contracts in 2012 have no employment protections based on sexual orientation. And more than two-thirds of those states (68%) have no employment nondiscrimination laws explicitly covering gender identity.

This discrimination with taxpayer money is a lose/lose proposition for taxpayers and LGBT workers—and it breaks America’s basic bargain that workers will judged and rewarded based on their contributions and capabilities. The new Issue Brief: The Need for an Executive Order—co-authored by MAP, the Center for American Progress, Freedom to Work, the Human Rights Campaign, and Out & Equal Workplace Advocates—looks at how an executive order prohibiting federal contractors from discriminating against LGBT workers would extend protections to an additional 16 million workers, and would cover more than 20% of the U.S. civilian workforce.

Related resources

History of MAP: Building Common Ground Through Messaging
This blog highlights the legacy and ongoing impact of MAP’s messaging work. Alongside this history, we include several perspectives from MAP’s strongest supporters.
In This Moment, It’s Crucial That States Protect LGBTQ+ Data
As federal data collection on LGBTQ+ people is scaled back, states and localities are increasingly being called on to fill widening gaps in research and data on LGBTQ+ communities.
The Supreme Court Just Upheld State Mail Ballot Receipt Deadlines
In June 2026, SCOTUS ruled that federal Election Day statutes do not prevent states from counting mail ballots that are postmarked by Election Day but arrive afterward. This blog summarizes the decision, which preserves mail ballot grace periods in 14 states and D.C. ahead of the 2026 midterms.
History of MAP: Leading Through Collaboration
This third installment of our spotlight anniversary series identifies important examples of collaboration and partnership across MAP’s history.
State-Level Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Data Practices: Inclusive Data, Responsible Governance
This report maps the landscape of state-level SOGI data collection, assesses emerging risks of data misuse, and identifies policies and practices for leaders committed to ethical, responsible data governance.
Advancing Responsible State-Level SOGI Data Practices

Collection of data on sexual orientation and gender identity (SOGI) by government entities can be a powerful tool to understand the experiences, needs, and disparities affecting LGBTQ+ populations, informing evidence-based policymaking, strengthening program accountability, and supporting civil rights enforcement. As federal efforts to collect LGBTQ-inclusive data are scaled back, state

History of MAP: Tracking Equality and Democracy Through State Policy
In this second installment of our “History of MAP” series, we highlight MAP’s extensive collection of policy research — from its origins in the early 2000s to its most recent expansion through the Democracy Program.
Support for Transgender People is Higher Than Headlines Suggest
This partner brief from MAP and Advocates for Trans Equality (A4TE) offers new analysis which shows that transgender people are widely accepted and supported by their families, workplaces, faith communities, and more.
Democracy Maps Updates: June 2026

Join our community

Get research updates, stories, and ways to support.